Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHABBIR@VALI DAWOOD KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Shabbir @ Vali Dawood Khan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 24 January 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata on 22 June 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

               ssm                                                   64-wp3840.2019.doc

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 3840 OF 2019

          Shabbir @ Vali Dawood Khan                           …..Petitioner

                   Vs.

          State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                          …..Respondents

                              ____________________________________

          None for the Petitioner.
          Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                            ____________________________________

                                            CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                              DATE :      22nd JUNE, 2026.


          P.C.:-

          1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

          2)             Record indicates that, after 24th January, 2020, neither the

          Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

          even once.

          2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

          Petition.

          3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                     (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                        (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                       1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.06.29
          12:26:39 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.