Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RATAN FRAMJI TATA AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Ratan Framji Tata & Anr., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 16 November 2015. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue in the absence of any prosecution by the petitioners. The court concluded that the lack of any action amounted to abandonment of the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • The petitioners' failure to appear and prosecute the writ petition warrants dismissal.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

            ssm                                                       47-wp3853.2015.doc

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 3853 OF 2015

       Ratan Framji Tata & Anr.                                       …..Petitioners

                Vs.

       State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioners.
       Mr. Ajay Patil APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :     A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :    4th MARCH, 2026.

       P.C.:-

       1)                None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

       2)                Record indicates that, after 16th November, 2015, Petitioners

       and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

       even for once.

       2.1)              It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

       the Petition.

       3)                Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

                  Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date: 2026.03.06                                                                 1/1
                  18:50:44 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.