Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RANJANA SOMA KHAIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

             ssm                                                        70-wp3915.2019.doc

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 3915 OF 2019

       Ranjana Soma Khaire                                              …..Petitioner

                 Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  …..Respondents

                               ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioner.
       Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                              CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                           KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.


       P.C.:-

       1)                 None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

       2)                 Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

       26th July, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps

       to circulate the Petition, even once.

       2.1)               It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

       Petition.

       3)                 Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                             (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
            Digitally signed
            by SANJIV
SANJIV      SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA   MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR   Date:                                                                            1/1
            2026.06.29
            12:24:00 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.