Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PADMINI LIKHARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Padmini Likhar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 19 November 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded without any further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • non‑prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • writ petition
  • court procedure

Judgment

            ssm                                                            74-wp3964.2019.doc

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                     CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 3964 OF 2019

       Padmini Likhar                                                      …..Petitioner

                 Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                                     …..Respondents

                                    ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioner.
       Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                                  CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                    DATE :      22nd JUNE, 2026.


       P.C.:-

       1)                      None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

       2)                      Record indicates that, after 19th November, 2019, neither the

       Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

       even once.

       2.1)                    It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

       Petition.

       3)                      Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                                (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

            Digitally signed
            by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                             1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
            2026.06.29
            12:27:44 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.