Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BAJIRAO MARUTI MOREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Bajirao Maruti More, filed a criminal writ petition challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. After the charge-sheet was filed in the underlying criminal case, the petitioner sought leave of the High Court to withdraw the writ petition and to file a fresh petition if desired. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Dheeraj Patil, argued that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the writ petition redundant. The Court examined whether a writ petition could be withdrawn after the charge-sheet was filed. The Court granted the petitioner's request, allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition may be withdrawn after the charge-sheet has been filed in the underlying case

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • criminal writ petition
  • charge-sheet
  • High Court of Bombay
  • procedural law

Judgment

                                                                                     12-WP-3999-2025 (CR).doc




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                            CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3999 OF 2025

                      Bajirao Maruti More                                ]       Petitioner
                            Vs.
                      State of Maharashtra and another                   ]       Respondents
                                                        .....
                      Mr. Dheeraj Patil (through V.C.) Advocate for Petitioner.

                      Ms. Priyanka Rane, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.

                      Mr. Abhijit V. Desai, for Respondent No.2.
         Digitally
         signed by
                                                         …..
         SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA SHRIKANT
SHRIKANT HALKUDE
                                                         CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
HALKUDE Date:
         2026.06.23
         10:51:39
                                                         DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
         +0530
                      P. C. :
                      1.            Mr. Patil, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states
                      that the charge-sheet has been filed and, therefore, seeks leave of this
                      Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.


                      2.         Leave as prayed for is granted. The petition is permitted to be
                      withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.


                      3.         The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.




                                                                             [SANDESH D. PATIL, J.]




                      Shailaja                              1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.