Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ALI RAZAK PARVEZ IRANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ali Razak Parvez Irani, filed a writ petition on 7 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court observed that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue the petition. It was inferred that the petitioner was not interested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                           sns                                                    120-wp-4018-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4018 OF 2018

                      Ali Razak Parvez Irani                                  … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     12th June 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      7th September, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                         1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.06.22
         12:46:04
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.