Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAM DASHRATH KOREversusCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLHA PARISHAD THANE AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Dashrath Kore, filed a writ petition (No. 403 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Thane, and six others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing, nor had any representation been made on the previous date. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and, pursuant to procedural rules, dismissed the petition for non-prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justices Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Sandeep V. Marne. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • procedural dismissal
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                  4-aswp-403-2023.doc




                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 403 OF 2023

         Digitally
         signed by
                       Ram Dashrath Kore                                   … Petitioner
         SHRADDHA
SHRADDHA KAMLESH
KAMLESH  TALEKAR
                                 Versus
TALEKAR  Date:
         2023.07.03
         18:41:08
                       1. Chief Executive Offcerr
         +0530
                       Zillha Parishadr Thane & 6 Ors.                     …Respondents

                                                         *****

                       None for petitioner.

                       Mr.B.V. Samantr AGP for State.

                                           CORAM :     DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR &
                                                       SANDEEP V. MARNEr JJ.

                                           DATE    :   28th JUNEr 2023.

                       PC:


                      1.      None present for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of

                      hearingr there was no representation.

                      2.      The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.




                      [ SANDEEP V. MARNEr J. ]               [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKURr J.]




       Shraddha Talekar, PS                                                                     1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.