Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NAGESH SHANKAR MATPATTE@PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 August 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue. It held that the lack of prosecution warranted dismissal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's inaction

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

             ssm                                                           79-wp4043.2019.doc

                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 4043 OF 2019

        Nagesh Shankar Matpatte @ Patil                                    …..Petitioner

                  Vs.

        The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                                    …..Respondents

                                  ____________________________________

        None for the Petitioner.
        Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                          ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.

        P.C.:-

        1)                   None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

        2)                   Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

        6th August, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

        steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

        2.1)                 It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

        Petition.

        3)                   Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                     (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                              (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.06.29
          12:25:26 +0530                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.