Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GULJARILAL SHAMLAL KANDHARI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition but failed to supply spare copies in the registry for issuing notice to the respondents for about ten years. After 20 January 2015, the petitioners and their advocates took no steps to circulate the petition even once. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to failure to serve notice and inactivity by the petitioners

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • service of notice
  • procedural default

Judgment

                    KSG                                                           49-WP-4052-2014.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 4052 OF 2014

                    Guljarilal Shamlal Kandhari & Ors                            … Petitioners
                             V/s.
                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors                               … Respondents
                                        _______________________________________

                    None for Petitioner.
                    Smt. P.P. Shinde, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
                                      _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
                                                DATE  : 17th JANUARY 2026
                    P.C. :

                    1)              Record indicates that, last about 10 years the Petitioners have

                    not supplied spare copies in the Registry for issuing notice to Respondents

                    and therefore the Respondents are not served till today.

                    1.1)            That, after 20th January 2015, Petitioners and/or their Advocates

                    have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                    2)              It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.

        Digitally
        signed by
        KIRAN
KIRAN SANJAY
SANJAY GHUGE
GHUGE Date:
       2026.01.20
        19:11:00
        +0530                ( SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. )                      ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.