Bombay High Court
TECHNOCRAFT INDUSTRIES INDIA LTD. AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, LABOUR, INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY DEPT. AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Rule Made Absolute
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Holding
The impugned order is set aside and the rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause “A”.
Summary
In a writ petition filed by Sayali Technocraft Industries India Ltd against Deepak Upasani, the State of Maharashtra and others, the parties consented to set aside the impugned order. The High Court, by order dated 23 April 2026, set aside the challenged order and made the rule absolute as per prayer clause “A”. No detailed facts or reasoning were recorded in the judgment excerpt. The decision effectively nullified the earlier order and affirmed the relief sought by the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether the impugned order should be set aside
Subjects
- writ petition
- set aside
- rule absolute
- consent of parties
Judgment
23-WP-4127-26.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4127 OF 2026
SAYALI Technocraft Industries India Ltd … Petitioner
DEEPAK V/s.
UPASANI State of Maharashtra and Others … Respondents
Digitally signed
by SAYALI
DEEPAK
UPASANI
Date: 2026.04.23 Mr. Avinash Jalisatgi with T. R. Yadav, Mulanshu Vora,
16:51:43 +0530
for Petitioner.
Ms. Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Hosanna
Fernandez, Advocate for Respondent no. 4.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : APRIL 23, 2026
P.C.:
1. By consent of the parties, the impugned order is set aside.
2. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause “A”.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…