Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAMMED JALALUDDIN MOHAMMAD AMIN KHAN @ JALALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner at the hearing and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel circulated the petition even once after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Relying on the principle that a petition must be actively pursued, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                           sns                                                    126-wp-4157-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4157 OF 2018

                      Mohammed Jalaluddin Mohammad
                      Amin Khan @ Jalal                                             … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                               … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     12th June 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      18th September, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                         1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.06.22
         12:46:07
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.