Bombay High Court
TRIMBAK PANDHARINATH THOMBREversusDAMODHAR HARIBHAU LANDGE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Trimbak Pandharinath Thombre, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Counsel submitted that the passage of time had rendered the matter infructuous. The court considered whether any relief could still be granted. Finding that the petition was no longer maintainable, the judge held that nothing survived for consideration. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous and any pending civil applications were also dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to lapse of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- limitation
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9934
1 34 WP 4171-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
34 WRIT PETITION NO. 4171 OF 2017
TRIMBAK PANDHARINATH THOMBRE
VERSUS
DAMODHAR HARIBHAU LANDGE
…
Mr. R.T. Deshmukh – Advocate for Petitioner
…
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE : 09.03.2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of
time the matter has become infructuous and, therefore, nothing survives
for consideration in the present petition.
2. In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.
3. Pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
JUDGE
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…