Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NAVIN NARAYAN GERA AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 25 September 2017 but failed to take any steps to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioners and their counsel did not appear for hearing and appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. On this basis, the court applied the principle of non‑prosecution, which allows dismissal when a party shows no intention to prosecute the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive legal arguments or evidence were presented, and the court issued a simple order of dismissal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioners' inaction?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

          ssm                                                              118-wp4225.2017.doc

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 4225 OF 2017

     Navin Narayan Gera & Anr.                                             …..Petitioners

                Vs.

     The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                   …..Respondents
                     ____________________________________

     None for the Petitioners.
     Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.

                                  ____________________________________

                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                   DATE :     18th APRIL, 2026.

     P.C.:-

     1)                      None for Petitioners when called out for hearing.

     2)                      Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

     25th September, 2017, the Petitioners and/or their Advocate have not taken

     any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

     2.1)                    It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

     the Petition.

     3)                      Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                 (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                                  (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.04.27
          18:40:45 +0530                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.