Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SWAPNIL PANDURANG DATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Swapnil Pandurang, filed a writ petition on 25 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non-prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                           sns                                                    131-wp-4236-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4236 OF 2018

                      Swapnil Pandurang Date                                  … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                         … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     12th June 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      25th September, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                      steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
                                                                                                         1/1
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.06.22
         12:46:05
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.