Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ADV. DIPTI SAROJ KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Dipti Saroj Kale, filed a writ petition on 19 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petition was scheduled for hearing but the petitioner failed to appear when called. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. It appeared that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be proceeded with. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • The court considered whether a writ petition may continue in the absence of the petitioner’s participation and without any effort to advance the petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

          ssm                                                      86-wp4244.2019.doc

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 4244 OF 2019

     Adv. Dipti Saroj Kale                                         …..Petitioner

              Vs.

     The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                               …..Respondents

                           ____________________________________

     None for the Petitioner.
     Mr. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                       ____________________________________

                                          CORAM :     A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                      KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                            DATE :    22nd JUNE, 2026.


     P.C.:-

     1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

     2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

     19th August, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

     steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

     2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

     Petition.

     3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

              Digitally signed
              by SANJIV
SANJIV        SHARNAPPA                                                                 1/1
SHARNAPPA     MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR     Date:
              2026.06.29
              12:22:41 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.