Bombay High Court
SAHIL HIRALAL ATTAR AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- SANDESH D PATIL
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Sahil Hiralal Attar and others, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the proceedings in RCC No. 411 of 2024. The charge in the case was framed on 12 May 2026, but the petitioners failed to appear when the matter was called out. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, Mr. S. V. Gavand, highlighted that since 2024 no steps had been taken to circulate the matter, indicating procedural neglect. The Court noted the lack of prosecution and the petitioners' non‑appearance as a basis to dismiss the petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when petitioners fail to appear and no effort is made to circulate the criminal matter?
Subjects
- criminal writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- charge framing
- non‑appearance
- procedural lapse
Judgment
60-WP-4259-2024 (CR).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4259 OF 2024
Sahil Hiralal Attar & Ors. …...Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …...Respondents
...
None for Petitioners.
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for Respondent-State.
...
CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
P. C. :
1. Mr. Gavand, learned APP, informs that the charge has been framed
on 12.05.2026 in RCC No. 411 of 2024. None appears for the
Petitioners when the matter was called out. It appears that since 2024,
no efforts have been taken to circulate the matter.
2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)
TALLE
SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Digitally signed by
TALLE SHUBHAM
ASHOKRAO
Date: 2026.06.22
19:18:03 +0530
Shubham 1
Checking your session…