Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRIDE UNIVERSAL PRIVATE LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petition was filed by Pride Universal Private Limited on 22 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue. It concluded that the lack of prosecution warranted dismissal. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

              ssm                                                     89-wp4365.2019.doc

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4365 OF 2019

         Pride Universal Private Limited                              …..Petitioner

                  Vs.

         State Of Maharashtra                                         …..Respondent

                             ____________________________________

         None for the Petitioner.
         Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                           ____________________________________

                                            CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                              DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.


         P.C.:-

         1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

         2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

         22nd August, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor its Advocate has taken any

         steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

         2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

         Petition.

         3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                    (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA                                                                        1/1
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.06.29
          12:24:35 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.