Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HARSHAD DHANESHLAL PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Harshad Dhaneshlal Patel, filed a writ petition on 27 August 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take any steps to pursue the petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

            ssm                                                      90-wp4405.2019.doc

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                              CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               WRIT PETITION NO. 4405 OF 2019

       Harshad Dhaneshlal Patel                                      …..Petitioner

                Vs.

       The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                               …..Respondents

                             ____________________________________

       None for the Petitioner.
       Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                         ____________________________________

                                           CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                        KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                             DATE :     22nd JUNE, 2026.


       P.C.:-

       1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

       2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

       27th August, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

       steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

       2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

       Petition.

       3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                       1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.06.29
          12:24:25 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.