Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRIYANKA YOGESH DIXITversusYOGESH PRAKASH DIXIT

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is dismissed because the family court proceedings are already disposed and no issue survives.

Summary

The petitioner, Priyanka Yogesh Dixit, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain matters arising from her matrimonial dispute with the respondent, Yogesh Prakash Dixit. The petition sought relief on the basis that the family court proceedings were either pending or incomplete. The respondent’s counsel submitted that the family court had already disposed of the proceedings and that no issue remained for the High Court to consider. The court examined whether any substantive relief could still be granted in view of the finality of the family court’s order. Finding that the family court’s disposal left no surviving cause of action, the court held that the writ petition could not proceed. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as there was nothing left to adjudicate.

Issues considered

  • What relief, if any, remains for the High Court to grant after the family court has disposed of the proceedings?

Subjects

  • family law
  • writ petition
  • disposal of proceedings
  • jurisdiction
  • finality of lower court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:23552

                                                                         956-WP-4413-2019.doc




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                956 WRIT PETITION NO. 4413 OF 2019

                                      Priyanka Yogesh Dixit
                                             VERSUS
                                       Yogesh Prakash Dixit
                                                ...
          Mr. Prajwal N. Shejul h/f Mr. D. R. Kale for the Petitioner.
          Mr. S. B. Bhosale for the Respondent.
                                                ...


                                              CORAM :      SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                              DATE :       12 JUNE 2026

          P. C.:

          1.        Mr. Bhosale, learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the

          proceedings before the Family Court are already disposed of and nothing

          survives in the present Petition.

          2.        In view of the above, the Petition is disposed of.



                                                    [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.]




          Shubham                                                                   Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.