Bombay High Court
MIRA PRAKASH THUBEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
A petition that is not pursued by the petitioner and for which no steps are taken to advance it may be dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 16 August 2019 but never appeared before the court and made no effort to advance the petition. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor her counsel circulated the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal reflects the principle that a petition must be actively pursued or it may be struck down for lack of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and take steps to advance the case?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
- high court
- criminal appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
pmk 47-WP-4430-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4430 OF 2019
Mira Prakash Thube … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms. Madhavi H. Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 25th June, 2026
P.C.:-
1) None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, since the filing of the Petition on 16 th
August, 2019, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any steps
to circulate the Petition, even once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…