Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SONAL BHATT WIFE OF DR. BIMAL BHATT AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.447 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 28th February 2018, the petitioners and/or their counsel failed to appear for subsequent hearings and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed for non‑prosecution. Applying the principle that a petition must be actively pursued, the court held that the lack of participation amounted to abandonment. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear and do not take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • non‑prosecution
  • writ petition
  • dismissal
  • failure to appear
  • procedural default

Judgment

                             sns                                                 203-wp-447-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.447 OF 2018

                      Sonal Bhatt & Anr.                                    … Petitioners

                               V/s.

                      Union of India & Ors.                                 … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioners.
                      Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :        A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :      18th April 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioners when called out for hearing

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 28th February, 2018, Petitioners

                      and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                      even for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing

                      the Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


         Digitally
         signed by

SUMEDH
         SUMEDH
         NAMDEO
                                                                                                       1/1
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.04.23
         19:48:04
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.