Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRAKASH SAKRU CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

The petitioner, Prakash, filed Writ Petition No. 448 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rameshwar Bhagwat, submitted written instructions to withdraw the petition. The court recorded these instructions as Exhibit‑X. Upon accepting the withdrawal, the bench held that there was no further cause of action to entertain. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:10066-DB


                                                                        m1-wp-448-2025.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD


                                 WRIT PETITION NO.448 OF 2025

                                    Prakash s/o Sakru Chavan
                                              Versus
                               The State of Maharashtra and others

                                                …
             Mr. Rameshwar Bhagwat, Advocate for the petitioner.
             Mrs. U. S. Bhosle, AGP for respondents/State.
                                                ...

                                    CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI &
                                                HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
                                      DATE : 09 MARCH 2026

             ORDER :


             .     Not on board. Upon mentioning, matter is taken on board.


             2.    Learned Advocate for the petitioner, upon written instructions,

             seeks withdrawal fo the writ petition. Those written instructions are

             taken on record by marking as Exhibit-‘X’.


             3.    Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.



             [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ]                  [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
                    JUDGE                                       JUDGE


             scm




                                                [1]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.