Bombay High Court

YOGESH NIWASRAO JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal: Disposed off as Withdrawn
Bench: SANDESH D PATIL

Holding

The petition was dismissed as the filing of the summary report concluded the matter and left no issue for the court to consider.

Summary

Petitioner Yogesh Niwasrao Jadhav filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Respondent State, through its Additional Public Prosecutor S. V. Gavand, informed the Court that a "Summary Report" had been filed in the underlying matter. The Court noted that the filing of this report effectively concluded the proceedings and left no remaining issue for adjudication. Consequently, the Court held that there was nothing further to consider on the petition. The petition was therefore disposed, with a direction that the petitioner may approach the appropriate forum if any new cause of action arises.

Subjects

criminal writ petition
summary report
petition disposal
high court

Judgment

                                                            72-WP-4521-2025 (CR).doc




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4521 OF 2025

Yogesh Niwasrao Jadhav                            …...Petitioner
     Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                   …...Respondents

                                   ...
Mr. Pranav Borgave, Advocate for the Petitioner (through vc).
Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                   ...

                                         CORAM: SANDESH D. PATIL, J.
                                         DATED: 22nd JUNE 2026.
P. C. :

1.        Mr. S. V. Gavand, Learned APP submits that an “A Summary”

Report has been filed in this matter .

2.        In view of the filing of the “A Summary” Report, nothing further

survives for consideration in the present Petition. Accordingly, the

Petition is disposed of.

3.        It is made clear that in the event any subsequent cause of action

arises, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to avail such remedy as may be

permissible in law, including filing appropriate proceedings.


                                                   (SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)


Suresh                               1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…