Bombay High Court
RAJABHAU VYENKATI MASKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous because the petitioner's prayer for appointment, sought pursuant to the letter dated 05.03.2015, no longer survived for adjudication.
Summary
The petitioner, Rajabhau Vyenkati Maske, filed Writ Petition No. 4526 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking appointment in respondent No. 4 institution/Zilla Parishad. The appointment was sought pursuant to a letter dated 05.03.2015. The petition was filed on 26.03.2017. When the matter was taken up, notice had been served on the petitioner, but no one appeared for the petitioner. The State was represented by the Additional Government Pleader for respondent Nos. 1 to 3, and respondent No. 4 was represented by an advocate. The Court observed that, in view of the prayers and the passage of time, the relief sought had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner's prayer for appointment in respondent No. 4 institution/Zilla Parishad had become infructuous.
Subjects
- service law
- appointment
- writ petition
- infructuous
- Zilla Parishad
- Maharashtra
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:31471-DB
1 62-wp 4526-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 4526 OF 2017
Rajabhau Vyenkati Maske .. Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others .. Respondents
None for Petitioner.
Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
Mr. U. S Mote, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
DATE : 27th JULY, 2026.
PER COURT :-
1. Though the notice is served upon the petitioner, today none
appears for the petitioner. Looking at the prayers it is seen that
the petitioner is seeking appointment in respondent No. 4
institution/Zilla Parishad. The petition is filed on 26.03.2017. An
appointment is sought pursuant to letter dated 05.03.2015.
2. Considering all above, this Court finds that, prayers in the
petition have become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition
stands disposed of as infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )
P.S.B.
Checking your session…