Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNDARABAI GOVARDHAN PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Sundarabai Govardhan Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 13, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 18 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue a writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • petitioner's non-appearance
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                           sns                                                  131-wp-4541-2017.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.4541 OF 2017

                      Sundarabai Govardhan Patil                            … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                       … Respondents




                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Vinod Chate, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                         CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :      18th April 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 13th February, 2018, Petitioner

                      and/or her Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                      for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                  (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

         Digitally
         signed by

SUMEDH
         SUMEDH
         NAMDEO
                                                                                                       1/1
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.04.23
         19:48:03
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.