Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DEELIP NAMDEORAO NADE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition upon the petitioner's request for disposal due to subsequent developments.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 4618 of 2018) was filed by Deelip Namdeorao Nade and others against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners sought relief against the respondents, though the specific grounds are not detailed in the judgment. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel drew the Court's attention to a subsequent development noted on page 7‑A of the amended petition, specifically paragraphs 17‑A and 17‑B. The counsel requested that the petition be disposed of in view of this development. The Court, after considering the request, ordered the disposal of the writ petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • disposal
  • subsequent development

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9122



                                                                          65 WP No.4618.2018
                                                     -1-

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 4618 OF 2018

                            DEELIP NAMDEORAO NADE AND OTHERS
                                              VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
              Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay P. Deshpande (VC)
              AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. D. R. Korde
              Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. P. P. Kothari
                                                  ...

                                    CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                        Date : 4th March, 2026

              PER COURT :-


              1.              Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.


              2.              The learned counsel for petitioner invited my attention to
              the page No. 7-A of the amended petition and more particularly para
              No. 17-A and 17-B. In view of the subsequent development, the learned
              counsel for petitioner wants disposal of the petition.


              3.              In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of.




                                                           (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)



              Omkar Joshi


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.