Bombay High Court
SHAIKH NAVAB SK.HUSENSABversusDASHRATH BHAURAO BHIWANDE AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ARUN R PEDNEKER
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Shaikh Navab, filed a writ petition in 2001 seeking relief against the respondents. Over the ensuing years, the matter remained unresolved and became stale. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the passage of time rendered the petition infructuous. The Court considered the claim of infructuity and found that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and any accompanying civil applications were also disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is infructuous due to lapse of time?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- limitation
- dismissal
- civil application
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:19502
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 WRIT PETITION NO. 4702 OF 2001
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7056 OF 2001 IN WP/4702/2001
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2002 IN WP/4702/2001
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 469 OF 2002 IN WP/4702/2001
SHAIKH NAVAB SK.HUSENSAB
VERSUS
DASHRATH BHAURAO BHIWANDE AND ORS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. N.P. Patil Jamalpurkar
AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. B.V. Virdhe
...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : April 30, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage
of time, the matter has became infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Civil Applications, if
any, also stand disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…