Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ANANDA DASHRATH PATIL AND ANR.versusKOGTA FINANCIAL (INDIA) LTD AND ANR.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The possession notice under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act was validly executed and the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, Ananda Dashrath Patil and another, filed a writ petition challenging a possession notice dated 8 April 2026 issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners. The Court observed that the possession notice had been taken to its logical end and that the petitioners possessed an alternate remedy under the SARFAESI Act. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. The judgment underscores that challenges to possession notices must be pursued through the statutory remedies provided in the Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether the possession notice issued under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act can be challenged by a writ petition in the High Court
  • Whether the petitioners have an alternative remedy under the SARFAESI Act that precludes the writ petition

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • SARFAESI Act
  • possession notice
  • non-prosecution
  • civil procedure
  • high court
  • writ petition

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:9615-DB

                                                                         27-WP-4706-2026(C).doc


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 4706 OF 2026

               Ananda Dashrath Patil And Another.                           ...Petitioners
                         Versus
               Kogta Financial (India) Ltd And Another.                     ...Respondents

                                                ——————
               None for the Petitioners.
                                                ——————
                                                  Coram :     Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                                              Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                                  Date      : October 06, 2026.
               P. C. :

               1.        The Petition challenges the possession notice dated 8th April,

               2026,      passed    under   Section   13(4)   of   the   Securitisation      and

               Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

               Act, 2002 (“SARFAESI Act”).

               2.        None appears on behalf of the Petitioners.

               3.        It appears that the possession notice has been taken to its logical

               end. In any event, the Petitioners have an alternate remedy under the

               SARFAESI Act. The Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.



                [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




               Jamadar - SL                        1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.