Bombay High Court
UDAY SAHEBSING PAWAR AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ARUN R PEDNEKER
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
Petitioner Uday Sahebsing Pawar and others filed a writ petition in 2001, but failed to appear before the court. The court observed that due to the passage of time the petition had become infructuous. No arguments or evidence were presented by the petitioner. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and also disposed of any accompanying civil application. The decision was delivered by Justice Arun R. Pedneker on April 30, 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be entertained when the petitioner does not appear and the matter has become infructuous?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- high court
- procedural default
- non-appearance
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:19506
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 WRIT PETITION NO. 4722 OF 2001
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1528 OF 2002 IN WP/4722/2001
UDAY SAHEBSING PAWAR AND ORS
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
...
AGP for Respondents 1 to 3 : Ms. J.P. Reddy
...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : April 30, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. None present for the petitioner. It appears that due to passage of
time, the matter has become infructuous.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Civil Application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
ssc/
Checking your session…