Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HAJI ILYAS HAJI ABDULLAHA KHATRI AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioners failed to pursue the writ.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. After March 17, 2020, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on account of the petitioners' failure to prosecute the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                  DTG                                                               94-Wp-478-2020.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 478 OF 2020

                  Haji Ilyas Haji Abdullaha Khatri & Ors.                          … Petitioners
                               V/s.
                  The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  … Respondents
                                          _______________________________________

                  None for Petitioners.

                  Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                   _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE  : 31st July 2026

                  P.C. :

                  1)                  None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing.

                  2)                  Record indicates that, after 17 th March 2020, neither the

                  Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken any steps to circulate the Petition,

                  even once.

                  2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the

                  Petition.

                  3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                   ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed
            by
DNYANESHWAR DNYANESHWAR
TULSHIRAM   TULSHIRAM
GHUMNAR     GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06
            18:34:57 +0530
                                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.