Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ASHFAQ ARIF PALWALAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARAHSTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashfaq Arif Palwala, filed a writ petition but repeatedly failed to give instructions to proceed, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court of this inability to assist in adjudication. The court noted the petitioner's disinterest and, finding no prosecution of the petition, dismissed it for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the petitioner does not cooperate or give instructions to proceed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                            pmk                                                   18-WP-4825-2019.doc



                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO.4825 OF 2019

                       Ashfaq Arif Palwala                                         … Petitioner

                                V/s.

                       The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents


                       Mr. Aarif Ali Khan for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent-State.
                       Mr. Deepak Hol, PSI, Pairavi Officer, Dr. B.B. Marg Police Station, Present.


                                                          CORAM :  A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                   KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
          Digitally
          signed by
                                                            DATE : 22nd July, 2026
          PRIYANKA
PRIYANKA  MADHAVRAO
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
          2026.07.27
          12:27:07
                       P.C.:-
          +0530




                       1)              Learned counsel for Petitioner submitted that, despite repeated

                       requests, the Petitioner did not give instructions to proceed further with the

                       Petition and therefore, he is unable to assist this Court in adjudication of

                       the Petition.

                       1.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                       Petition.

                       3)              Dismissed for want of prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)



                                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.