Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHREERAM TAKSANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Shreeram Taksande, filed a writ petition on 20 October 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear and does not pursue a filed writ petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                  Sbw                                                    166-WP-4835-2018.doc




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO.4835 OF 2018

                             Shreeram Taksande                                       … Petitioner

                                      V/s.

                             State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents
                             [




                             None for the Petitioner.
                             Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                                   DATE :     12th June, 2026

                             P.C.:-

                             1)              None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                             2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                             20th October, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                             steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                             2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                             Petition.

                             3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
                                         (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
        2026.06.17
          15:57:08 +0530
                                                                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.