Bombay High Court

SAHEBRAO NARAYAN BORDEversusSHANTABAI HARAKCHAND SONI THROUGH LRS RAMESHCHANDRA HARAKCHAND SONI AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The petition is dismissed as infructuous due to the lapse of time.

Summary

Sahebrao Narayan Borde filed a writ petition (21 WRIT PETITION NO. 4851 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Shantabai Harakchand Soni and others. The respondents, through counsel Mr. Darak, argued that the petition had become infructuous because of the extensive passage of time since its filing. The Court examined the claim of lapse of time and found that the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous. No substantive merits of the original claim were addressed.

Issues considered

What is the effect of the passage of time on the viability of the writ petition?

Subjects

writ petition
limitation
infructuous
petition dismissed
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:19682
              Dilwale                                        1                    21-WP-4851-18.odt




                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   21 WRIT PETITION NO. 4851 OF 2018

                                   Sahebrao Narayan Borde
                                           VERSUS
              Shantabai Harakchand Soni Through Lrs Rameshchandra Harakchand
                                       Soni And Others
                                              ...
             Advocate for Respondent Nos.1C & 1D : Mr. Darak B.A.
                                              ...

                                        CORAM         : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                        DATE          : 28.04.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.         Mr. Darak, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that, due

             to the passage of time, the present petition has become infructuous.

             2.         In view thereof, the petition is disposed of as infructuous.



                                                           [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                     JUDGE

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…