Bombay High Court

MAHANANDA GANGADHARAPPA BURANDEversusVAISHALI VIJAY BURANDE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil application has been disposed of.

Summary

Mahananda Gangadharappa Buranade filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous application (No. 18 of 2019) filed by Vaishali Vijay Buranade. The court noted that the underlying civil application had already been disposed of on 28 April 2023, leaving no substantive matter for the petition to address. Consequently, the court held that the writ petition was infructuous. The petition was therefore dismissed. No substantive legal issues were examined beyond the procedural point of the petition's redundancy.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the underlying civil application has already been disposed of?

Subjects

writ petition
infructuous
civil miscellaneous application
petition dismissal
procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:1803
                                                  1                           953 WP 4864-2021.odt




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                953 WRIT PETITION NO. 4864 OF 2021

                               MAHANANDA GANGADHARAPPA BURANDE
                                            VERSUS
                                     VAISHALI VIJAY BURANDE

                                                 …
             Mr. Sunil V. Warad – Advocate for Petitioner
                                                 …

                                     CORAM            : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                                     DATE             : 17.01.2026

             PER COURT :
             1.       The present proceedings arise out          of   Civil   Miscellaneous

             Application No. 18 of 2019 filed below Exhibit 33. The record indicates

             that Civil M.A. No.18 of 2019 has already been disposed of on

             28.04.2023. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the present

             petition.


             2.       In view thereof, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as infructuous.



                                                         [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ]
                                                                   JUDGE
             Pooja Kale/

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…