Bombay High Court

SANDEEP PANDURANG GAJAREversusSHEELA @ JYOTI SANDEEP GAJARE

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF
Bench: SACHIN S DESHMUKH

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Sandeep Pandurang Gajare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against Sheela @ Jyoti Sandeep Gajare. The petition was listed for hearing on 12 June 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear. The Court adjourned the matter to 10 July 2026, giving the petitioner another opportunity to prosecute the case. On the adjourned date, the petitioner again did not appear before the Court. In view of the repeated non‑appearance and lack of any explanation or request for further time, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by Justice Sachin S. Deshmukh on 10 July 2026.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner repeatedly fails to appear for hearing without any justification?

Subjects

writ petition
dismissal
want of prosecution
procedural default
court adjournment

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:27730


                          IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               1 WRIT PETITION NO. 4928 OF 2008

                                    Sandeep Pandurang Gajare
                                             VERSUS
                                  Sheela @ Jyoti Sandeep Gajare
                                                ...
                                   None Present for the parties.
                                                ...

                                 CORAM      : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                 Dated      : July 10, 2026

           PER COURT :-

           1.       When this matter was called on 12/06/2026, none appeared for

           the petitioner. As such, the matter was deferred for two weeks and

           was posted to 10/07/2026. Today also, none appears for the petitioner.

           In view thereof, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.




                                                           (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)




           vj gawade/-.




                                             Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…