Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NITIN MAGAN KOKANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition (No. 4954 of 2014) was filed by Nitin Magan Kokane before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 22 June 2016, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not take steps to advance the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • procedural default

Judgment

           ssm                                                      45-wp4954.2014.doc

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                               CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                WRIT PETITION NO. 4954 OF 2014

      Nitin Magan Kokane                                      …..Petitioner

               Vs.

      The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.                         …..Respondents

                              ____________________________________

      None for the Petitioner.
      Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                        ____________________________________

                                           CORAM :       A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
                                             DATE :      12th FEBRUARY, 2026.


      P.C.:-

      1)                None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

      2)                Record indicates that, after 22nd June, 2016, Petitioner and/or

      his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

      2.1)              It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

      Petition.

      3)                Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                 (R.M. JOSHI, J.)                            (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


           Digitally signed
           by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR Date:
           2026.02.16
           18:01:09 +0530                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.