Bombay High Court
MR.RAJENDRAKUMAR KALICHARAN VERMAversusMR.MANGILAL BHIMRAMJI CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that after 28 January 2016 the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be kept alive without the petitioner’s active participation. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and to circulate the petition?
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- court procedure
- petitioner's absence
Judgment
KSG 24-WP-500-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 500 OF 2015
Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma … Petitioner
V/s.
Mr. Mangilal Bhimaramji Chaudhary & Others … Respondents
_______________________________________
Digitally
signed by
Petitioner in person is not present.
KIRAN KIRAN
SANJAY
SANJAY
GHUGE
Date:
Smt. P. P Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
GHUGE 2026.04.27
12:59:52
+0530 _______________________________________
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
DATE : 18th APRIL 2026
P.C. :
1) Petitioner in person is not present, when called out for hearing.
2) Record indicates that, after 28th January, 2016, Petitioner has not
taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.
2.1) It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the
Petition.
3) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
1/1
Checking your session…