Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR.RAJENDRAKUMAR KALICHARAN VERMAversusMR.MANGILAL BHIMRAMJI CHAUDHARY AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that after 28 January 2016 the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be kept alive without the petitioner’s active participation. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and to circulate the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure
  • petitioner's absence

Judgment

                      KSG                                                           24-WP-500-2015.doc



                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 500 OF 2015

                      Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma                           … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      Mr. Mangilal Bhimaramji Chaudhary & Others                   … Respondents
                                          _______________________________________

         Digitally
         signed by
                      Petitioner in person is not present.
KIRAN    KIRAN

SANJAY
         SANJAY
         GHUGE
         Date:
                      Smt. P. P Shinde, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
GHUGE    2026.04.27
         12:59:52
         +0530                         _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                          KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                  DATE  : 18th APRIL 2026

                      P.C. :

                      1)              Petitioner in person is not present, when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, after 28th January, 2016, Petitioner has not

                      taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even for once.

                      2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                      ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )




                                                                                                         1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.