Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHARATI DAMODAR CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Bharati Damodar Chaudhari, filed a writ petition on 22 January 2020 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges of the bench.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non-prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • petitioner's non-appearance

Judgment

                DTG                                                                96-Wp-501-2020.doc



                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 501 OF 2020

                Bharati Damodar Chaudhari                                        … Petitioner
                             V/s.
                The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                  … Respondents
                                        _______________________________________

                None for Petitioner.

                Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                 _______________________________________

                                                 CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                         KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE  : 31st July 2026

                P.C. :

                1)                  None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                2)                  Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                22nd January 2020, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

                steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                2.1)                It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                Petition.

                3)                  Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                    ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

            Digitally signed by
            DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06
                                                                                                        1/1
            18:33:58 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.