Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. FIZA CONSTRUCTION CO. THRU PROP. MR. G. R. MUJAWAR THRU POA P B DESHMUKHversusRAMCHANDRA S. DESHMUKH DECD THRU LHR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

M/s Fiza Constructions Co. filed a writ petition (No. 5034 of 2019) in the High Court of Bombay against the legal heirs of the deceased Ramchandra S. Deshmukh. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The Court, recalling its earlier order, observed that the petition had not been prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for want of prosecution

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                       (1)-WP-5034-19.doc.


                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally
          signed by
          BALAJI
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BALAJI    GOVINDRAO
GOVINDRAO PANCHAL
PANCHAL   Date:
          2022.03.28
          17:48:25
          +0530
                                         WRIT PETITION NO.5034 OF 2019

                       M/s. Fiza Constructions Co.                 ..Petitioner
                             Versus
                       Ramchandra S. Deshmukh
                       Since deceased through legal heirs
                       Yamunabai Wd/o Ramchandra Deshmukh and Ors. ..Respondents

                       None for the Petitioner.
                       Mr. Prasad B. Kulkarni, for the Respondent Nos.1A to 1F.
                       Mr. Anant Vadgaonkar i/by Mr. Raghvendra B. Kulkarni, for the
                       Respondent No.2.

                                                    CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

                                                      DATE : 25th MARCH, 2022

                       P.C.

                       1.          None appears for the petitioner.


                       2.          In view of last order, petition stands dismissed for want
                       of prosecution.


                                                                [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]




                       BGP.                                                       1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.