Bombay High Court
MRS.SONALI RAMDAS SASANE AND ANRversusMR.NARENDRA RAVINDRA SATKAR AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Mrs. Sonali Ramdas Sasane and another, filed a criminal writ petition but failed to appear before the Court at any stage. The record shows that since 27 June 2016 the petitioners and/or their counsel took no steps to circulate the petition, and they were absent on the final date of 17 June 2026. The Court observed that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioners fail to appear and take no steps to pursue the petition?
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- dismissal
- criminal writ petition
- procedural default
- high court
Judgment
SPG 3-WP-504-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 504 OF 2015
Mrs.Sonali Ramdas Sasane & Anr. … Petitioners
Vs.
Mr.Narendra Ravindra Satkar & Ors. ... Respondents
_______________________________
None for the Petitioners.
Ms. Sangita Phad, APP for the Respondent-State.
_______________________________
CORAM : RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.
DATED : 17th JUNE, 2026.
P. C. :-
1) When the matter is called out, none appears for the
Petitioners.
2) Record indicates that since 27th June 2016, the Petitioners
and/or their Advocate have not taken any steps to circulate the Petition,
even for once. Even on the last date i.e. 17 th June 2026 none appeared for
the Petitioners.
3) It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing
the Petition.
4) Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…