Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BANSI FULSING PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy.

Summary

Bansi Fulsing Pawar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through advocates Gulabrao K. Salve and Sanjaykumar B. Chavan, sought permission to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. The Court considered the request and noted that any time spent on the present petition would be counted towards any limitation period for the alternate remedy. The Court granted the petitioner's request, ordering the writ petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed, and the petitioner was directed to consider the time spent when invoking any other remedy.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail an alternate remedy

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • alternate remedy
  • procedural law
  • high court order

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:4302
                                                (1)                       916-wp-5067-2025.odt



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 5067 OF 2025

                                    BANSI FULSING PAWAR
                                           VERSUS
                 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DISTRICT
                                   COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
                                              ...
               Mr. Gulabrao K. Salve and Mr. Sanjaykumar B. Chavan, Advocate
               for the Petitioner.
               Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State.
                                              ...
                                       CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                       DATED : 28th JANUARY, 2026.
               P.C.:-

               1.      The       learned     Advocate   appearing   for    petitioner,           on
               instructions, seeks permission to withdraw Writ Petition with
               liberty to avail alternate remedy as permissible under law.


               2.      Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as
               prayed.


               3.      Needless to state here that, time consumed in prosecuting
               present Writ Petition be considered while counting delay while
               availing alternate remedy.


                                                          (S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR)
                                                                   JUDGE
               Devendra/January-2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.