Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VIDYADHAR S/O. GOVIND TELANGversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Vidyadhar s/o Govind Telang, filed a writ petition on 14 November 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata on 12 June 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground of non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                             Sbw                                                  181-WP-5127-2018.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.5127 OF 2018

                     Vidyadhar s/o Govind Telang                              … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                     The State of Maharashtra                                 … Respondent




                     None for the Petitioner.
                     Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     12th June, 2026

                     P.C.:-

                     1)               None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                     2)               Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                     14th November, 2018, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                     steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                     2.1)             It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                     Petition.

                     3)               Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU
        WADHWA
BHAGU   Date:                                                                                            1/1
WADHWA 2026.06.22
          17:47:33
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.