Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DHARAM SINGH RAMSINGH DHAMI AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners filed a writ petition on 2 November 2018 but failed to appear at the hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court held that the petition was not being prosecuted. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                                  Sbw                                                    185-WP-5190-2018.doc




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                     WRIT PETITION NO.5190 OF 2018

                             Dharam Singh Ramsingh Dhami & Anr.                      … Petitioners

                                      V/s.

                             State of Maharashtra & Ors.                             … Respondents




                             None for the Petitioners.
                             Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                                 CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                              KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                                   DATE :     12th June, 2026

                             P.C.:-

                             1)              None appears for Petitioner, when called out for hearing.

                             2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                             2nd November, 2018, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocate have taken

                             any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                             2.1)            It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                             Petition.

                             3)              Dismissed for non-prosecution.



          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
                                         (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                     (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
SANDHYA BHAGU
BHAGU   WADHWA
WADHWA Date:
        2026.06.17
          15:57:09 +0530
                                                                                                                1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.