Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ABHIMANYU SADASHIV BIKKAD AND ORSversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The High Court may permit a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition and dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Abhimanyu Sadashiv Bikkad and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the Union of India. During the pendency of the petition, supervening events rendered the purpose of the petition moot. The petitioners, through their counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition pending before the High Court?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • High Court
  • civil procedure
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:22035-DB
                                                                          920-wp-5191-2026.odt
                                                     (1)


                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 5191 OF 2026

                                  Abhimanyu Sadashiv Bikkad And Ors
                                                 VERSUS
                              The Union Of India Thr Its Secretary And Ors
                                                     ...
                      Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. Jadhavar Santosh Sampatrao
                            Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. N.T. Bhagat
                                                     ...
                                               CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                          (VACATION COURT)
                                               DATED : MAY 29, 2026

                PER COURT :-

                1.             Learned advocate appearing for petitioners submits that

                in view of supervening events, the purpose of filing present petition is

                over. Hence, seeks permission to withdraw writ petition.

                2.             Permission granted.    Writ Petition stands dismissed as

                withdrawn.




                                                           (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)




                Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.