Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANJAY VITTHAL KAPSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 5 July 2021 but failed to appear for any hearing and took no steps to advance the case. The petition was last listed on 9 April 2026, when the petitioner’s counsel sought an adjournment citing personal difficulty. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to pursue the case

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • procedural default
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             sns                                                   31-wp-5312-2021.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                              WRIT PETITION NO.5312 OF 2021

                      Sanjay Vitthal Kapse                                    … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                         … Respondents


                      None for the Petitioner.
                      Smt. P. P. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent-State.

                                                          CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                            DATE :     2nd July 2026
                      P.C.:-

                      1)              None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                      2)              Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                      5th July 2021, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to

                      circulate the Petition, even once.

                      2.1)            That, the Petition was lastly listed on board on 9 th April, 2026,

                      when the learned Advocate for Petitioner had sought adjournment on the

                      ground that, the Advocate on record was in personal difficulty.

                      3)              It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                      Petition.

                      4)              Dismissed for non prosecution.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

                                                                                                         1/1
         Digitally
         signed by
         SUMEDH
SUMEDH   NAMDEO
NAMDEO   SONAWANE
SONAWANE Date:
         2026.07.08
         10:55:40
         +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.