Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

HARESH MURJIBHAI PATELversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The petition under Article 226 for lodging of a crime is not maintainable and is therefore dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Haresh Murjibhai Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the court to order the lodging of a crime by taking cognizance of a complaint dated 26 October 2018. The petition was filed in the High Court of Bombay's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798), which clarified the scope of Article 226 in criminal matters. Relying on that precedent, the bench held that the petition was not maintainable. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without any order directing the lodging of the crime.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the court to direct the lodging of a crime is maintainable in view of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra.

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Writ Petition
  • Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Maintainability
  • Supreme Court precedent

Judgment

                             Sbw                                               190-WP-5313-2018 .doc




                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO.5313 OF 2018

                     Haresh Murjibhai Patel                                … Petitioner

                               V/s.

                     The State of Maharashtra                              … Respondents




                     Mr. Amit Dubey i/by Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the Petitioner.
                     Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP, for the Respondent-State.


                                                        CORAM :     A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                    KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE :   12th June, 2026

                     P.C.:-

                                      In view of the recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case

                     of Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

                     reported in 2026 SCC OnLine SC 798, the present Petition under Article

                     226 of the Constitution of India for lodgment of a crime by taking

                     cognizance of the complaint dated 26 th October, 2018 of the Petitioner, is

                     not maintainable and is accordingly disposed off.



                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                  (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANDHYA
SANDHYA BHAGU
        WADHWA
BHAGU   Date:                                                                                      1/1
WADHWA 2026.06.22
          17:47:30
          +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.