Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SANTOSH ANAND CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear or take any steps to advance the petition.

Summary

A writ petition was filed on 16 October 2019 by Santosh Anand Chavan seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court found that the petition had not been prosecuted. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • petition
  • non-prosecution
  • high court
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                DTG                                                              50-Wp-5377-2019.doc



                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                         CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION NO. 5377 OF 2019

                Santosh Anand Chavan                                           … Petitioner
                          V/s.
                The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                … Respondents
                                      _______________________________________

                None for Petitioner.

                Mr. Shrikant V. Gavand, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                 _______________________________________

                                               CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                               DATE  : 31st July 2026

                P.C. :

                1)                None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                2)                Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

                16th October 2019, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

                steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

                2.1)              It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the

                Petition.

                3)                Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                  ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                    ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )
            Digitally signed by
            DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR
            Date: 2026.08.06
            19:00:45 +0530
                                                                                                       1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.