Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAJVINDARSINGH AJEET SINGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajvindarsingh Ajeet Singh, filed Writ Petition No. 5396 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court. After 31 January 2018, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear for any further hearing and did not take steps to circulate the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the Court held that the petition could not be kept alive. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. The order was signed by Justices Kamal Khata and A.S. Gadkari on 18 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and does not circulate the petition.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • high court
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • petitioner's non‑appearance

Judgment

        ssm                                                       176-wp5396.2017.doc

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  WRIT PETITION NO. 5396 OF 2017

   Rajvindarsingh Ajeet Singh                                      …..Petitioner

              Vs.

   The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                   …..Respondents
                   ____________________________________

   None for the Petitioner.
   Mr. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                     ____________________________________

                                            CORAM :    A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                       KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                              DATE :   18th APRIL, 2026.

   P.C.:-

   1)                 None for Petitioner when called out for hearing.

   2)                 Record indicates that, after 31st January, 2018, Petitioner

   and/or his Advocate has not taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

   for once.

   2.1)               It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

   Petition.

   3)                 Dismissed for non-prosecution.



               (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                           (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


               Digitally signed
               by SANJIV
SANJIV         SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA      MASHALKAR
MASHALKAR      Date: 2026.04.27
               18:45:09 +0530
                                                                                        1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.