Bombay High Court
ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGERversusBHASKAR SHIVDAS PATIL AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ARUN R PEDNEKER
Holding
The writ petitions were dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered two writ petitions (Nos. 5409 and 5418 of 2012) filed by Orion Ropes Pvt. Ltd. against different respondents. Court service notices were served on the petitioner on 15 March 2014 and 29 April 2014 respectively. The petitioner failed to file any appearance or response after the notices were served. The Court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petitions. Consequently, both writ petitions were dismissed for non‑prosecution. The judgment was delivered by Justice Arun R. Pedneker on 4 March 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear after service of a court notice
Subjects
- writ petition
- non‑prosecution
- court service notice
- dismissal
- procedural default
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:9156
1 wps5409&5418.2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
29 WRIT PETITION NO. 5409 OF 2012
ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGER
VERSUS
VITTHAL MADHUKAR CHAVAN AND ANR
...
Petitioner : Court Service Notice Served
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Shrikant S. Patil
…
WITH
…
WRIT PETITION NO. 5418 OF 2012
ORION ROPES PVT. LTD. THR MANAGER
VERSUS
BHASKAR SHIVDAS PATIL AND ANR
…
Petitioner : Court Service Notice Served
Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Shrikant S. Patil
...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 04.03.2026
PER COURT:
1. In both the matters, court service notices are served on
the petitioner in the year 2014 i.e. on 15.03.2014 and 29.04.2014 in
respective petitions. However, none has entered appearance for the
petitioner.
2. Both the Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-
prosecution.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.]
marathe
Checking your session…