Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHAMMED MUZAMMILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

A writ petition was filed by Mohammed Muzammil before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 13 March 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, the court held that the petition could not be entertained further. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case

Subjects

  • petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                    DTG                                                                  57-Wp-5438-2019.doc



                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 5438 OF 2019

                    Mohammed Muzammil                                                  … Petitioner
                                     V/s.
                    The State of Maharashtra & Ors.                                    … Respondents
                                               _______________________________________

                    None for Petitioner.

                    Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.
                                     _______________________________________

                                                        CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                        DATE  : 31st July 2026

                    P.C. :

                    1)                      None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

                    2)                      Record indicates that, after 13 th March 2020, neither the

                    Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even

                    once.

                    2.1)                    It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

                    Petition.

                    3)                      Dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                            ( KAMAL KHATA, J. )                  ( A.S. GADKARI, J. )

               Digitally signed by
               DNYANESHWAR
DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM
TULSHIRAM   GHUMNAR
GHUMNAR     Date: 2026.08.06
               18:41:50 +0530
                                                                                                               1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.